The Interest Incentive Effect:
The interest incentive effect Refers to a change in interest rates ,thereby including a change in the incentive to business firms ,government bodies and consumers to purchase capital goods and stocks of commodities, and so cause a change in actual spending on labor and other factor of production .theoretically speaking, a change in interest rates represents a change in the cost of money and may , therefore ,have some effect on the incentive to invest in other fixed capital or in stocks of commodities. On the practical side, the Radcliff committee did not find any convincing evidence of the presence of interest incentive effect in recent years. The witnesses who appeared before the committee expressed the view that changes in the interest rates or cost money were insignificant in comparison with the other costs of production ,often particularly in relation to the element of risk in an undertaking . The cost of money was so small in relation to other costs & risks involved in the case not only of fixed investment but even of holding stocks of commodities that the changes in the interest rates were an unimportant factor to make the merchants & investors to change their plans. The nationalized industries also reported that their capital development had been often by the availability of material or the availability of labor, by administrative decision but not by the rate of interest. The committee also pointed out how “taxation in effect halves the interest cost.” However there are some “expectations” when changes in the rate of interest did have some influence, especially when they were working on narrow margins. The committee came to the conclusion in regard to the interest – incentive effects that while the effects were there & real, they were not on a large & substantial scale.
The General liquidity Effect:
The general liquidity effect influences “the liquidity condition of financial institutions and of business firms and people generally.” In the analysis of the generally liquidity effect the committee explains, though not with sufficient clarity its concept of “the wider structure of liquidity in the economy” of which it regards the supply of money as only a part. Liquidity depends upon “the methods, moods & resources of financial institutions and other firms which are prepared to finance other people’s spending. The general liquidity effect, thus, pertains not to the behavior of borrowers but the behavior of lenders. The committee found that changes in the interest rates could affect the liquidity structure of the economy by altering the capital values of financial assets held by different financial institutions & others. A rise in interest rates would lead to fall in the capital values of financial assets & this would make their holders reluctant to sell them or to lend to the would be borrowers. With a fall in interest rates assets would appreciate in the capital value & thus encourage their owners to lend more. This is the effect which seems to have particularly influenced the well known Radcliff thesis: “A rise in interest rates makes some less willing to lend because capital values have fallen & others because their own interest rates are sticky. A fallen in rates, on the other hand, strengthens balance sheets & encourages lenders to seek new business.”
The significance of interest rates lies not in the interest rate as a cost to the borrowers, or as inducement to the saver, but rather as a reflection of underlying changes in the supply of credit. Thus taking separately, general liquidity effect has more weight than the interest – incentive effect. But when both were taken together, the Radcliff committee reached the conclusion that while the pressure of interest, particularly if spread through the whole structure from short term to long term rates, was real, it was also gradual & not very large. It is mainly as a psychological weapon that Bank rate exercise its influence.